El Paso County on the border of

Boasberg wrote that he accepted the administration’s declaration, filed under seal, providing details of the government’s deal with El Salvador to house deportees and how that means the Venezuelans are technically under the legal control of El Salvador and not the United States. He added, while noting there is a criminal penalty for providing false testimony, that believing those representations was “rendered more difficult given the Government’s troubling conduct throughout this case.”He also noted parallels with another case where the Trump administration admitted it

deported a Maryland man to El Salvador and has been ordered by a judge, appellate judges and the U.S. Supreme Court to “facilitate” his return., remains in El Salvador more than two months later.ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt welcomed Boasberg’s ruling.

“This is a significant step forward to getting these men the chance to show that they should not ever have been removed under a wartime authority,” Gelernt told reporters in San Diego after a hearing in a separate, unrelated case.In that case, a federal judge Wednesday found the Trump administration violated a settlement to provide legal advice to thousands of families that were separated at the border. U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw said he would likely decide on concrete steps by early next week.

In the AEA case, Boasberg’s order is only the latest of a blizzard of legal rulings.

Several judges have temporarily halted deportations under the act in parts of Texas, New York, California, Pennsylvania and elsewhere, finding the administration’s 24 hour window that it gave detainees to challenge their designation under the act did not meet the Supreme Court’s requirement of providing a “reasonable” chance to seek relief. Deportations of people in the country illegally can continue in those areas under laws other than the AEA,Trump publicó en redes sociales que su larga charla con Putin, la cual se produjo en un momento en que se prolonga el estancamiento sobre las negociaciones de paz, “fue una buena conversación, pero no una que llevará a la paz inmediata”.

Es la primera vez que Trump se pronuncia sobre el audaz ataque de Ucrania dentro de territorio ruso. Según la Casa Blanca, Estados Unidos no tuvo conocimiento previo de la operación, un punto que Trump enfatizó durante la llamada con Putin, según el asesor de asuntos exteriores del mandatario ruso.La llamada se produce en momentos en que Washington encabeza un impulso diplomático para negociar un acuerdo de paz después de casi tres años y medio de guerra .

En su publicación, Trump no mencionó cómo reaccionó a la promesa de Putin de responder al ataque de Ucrania, pero no mostró la frustración que ha expresado con su homólogo ruso en las últimas semanas por prolongar la guerra.Yuri Ushakov, asesor de asuntos exteriores de Putin, dijo en conferencia de prensa que ambos gobernantes calificaron la llamada como “positiva y bastante productiva”.